跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以 ARCH 条件异方差模型中的波动效应检验作为详细应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

针对单侧备择的得分类检验

研究问题
在存在干扰参数且备择包含向量不等式约束时,如何构造只需拟合原假设、又适用于估计方程的单侧检验?
方法与思路
作者在估计函数框架中构造得分类统计量,讨论其与似然比统计量的渐近关系,并以 ARCH 效应检验说明计算方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该检验保留仅估计原假设模型的便利性,并具有与似然比统计量渐近等价的性质,无需知道精确总体分布。
阅读关注点
应核对单侧约束下统计量的构造、零假设分布和临界值,以及估计函数替代似然得分后的正则条件与计算步骤。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;渐近等价条件和有限样本性质未说明,未知分布不意味着完全无假设。

原文摘要

A score-type statistic, T s , is introduced for testing H: ψ = 0 against K: ψ ≥ 0 and more general one-sided hypotheses when nuisance parameters may be present; ψ is a vector parameter. The main advantages of T s , are that it requires estimation of the model only under the null hypothesis and that, it is asymptotically equivalent to the likelihood ratio statistic; these are precisely the reasons for the popularity of the score tests for testing against two-sided alternatives. In this sense, T s preserves the main attractive features of the classical two-sided score test. The theoretical results are presented in a general framework where the likelihood-based score function is replaced by an estimating function so that the test is applicable even if the exact population distribution is unknown. Computation of T s , is simplified by the fact that it can be computed easily once the corresponding two-sided statistic has been computed. The relevance and simplicity of T s are illustrated by discussing a data example in detail. This example involves an autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) model, and the objective is to test for the presence of ARCH effect. The null and alternative hypotheses turn out to be of the form H: ψ = 0 and K: ψ ≥ 0 respectively where ψ is the vector of ARCH parameters. In contrast to the likelihood ratio and other equivalent forms that are currently available for testing against such one-sided hypotheses, we note the following: T s is convenient to apply, because the full ARCH model need not be estimated subject to the inequality constraint ψ ≥ 0 and we do not need to know the exact likelihood because T s is based on estimating equations rather than likelihoods.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文