跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要综述观察性研究中 TMLE 的应用,并明确按因果推断路线图提取方法要素,因此选择因果推断这一直接方向。

反馈分类问题

Application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation in public health and epidemiological studies: a systematic review

目标最大似然估计在公共卫生与流行病学中的应用:系统综述

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

目标最大似然估计在公共卫生与流行病学中的应用:系统综述

研究问题
目标最大似然估计在观察性流行病学研究中如何传播,其应用领域、地域分布、方法选择和采用动机随时间如何变化?
方法与思路
作者在 PubMed 系统检索应用 TMLE 的观察性研究,纳入八十一篇文献,并按目标学习与因果推断路线图提取方法信息。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要描述 TMLE 向更多地域和流行病学领域扩散,归纳双重稳健性、偏差与误设等采用动机,以及软件和教程的支持作用。
阅读关注点
应核对检索时间与纳排标准、方法信息提取规则,以及综述是否评估各应用的识别条件、实现质量和实际推断表现。
阅读边界
所给来源为 arXiv 预印本,不能据此认定已同行评审或期刊接收;使用增长及采用动机不能证明 TMLE 在所有任务中更优。

原文摘要

The Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) statistical data analysis framework integrates machine learning, statistical theory, and statistical inference to provide a least biased, efficient and robust strategy for estimation and inference of a variety of statistical and causal parameters. We describe and evaluate the epidemiological applications that have benefited from recent methodological developments. We conducted a systematic literature review in PubMed for articles that applied any form of TMLE in observational studies. We summarised the epidemiological discipline, geographical location, expertise of the authors, and TMLE methods over time. We used the Roadmap of Targeted Learning and Causal Inference to extract key methodological aspects of the publications. We showcase the contributions to the literature of these TMLE results. Of the 81 publications included, 25% originated from the University of California at Berkeley, where the framework was first developed by Professor Mark van der Laan. By the first half of 2022, 70% of the publications originated from outside the United States and explored up to 7 different epidemiological disciplines in 2021-22. Double-robustness, bias reduction and model misspecification were the main motivations that drew researchers towards the TMLE framework. Through time, a wide variety of methodological, tutorial and software-specific articles were cited, owing to the constant growth of methodological developments around TMLE. There is a clear dissemination trend of the TMLE framework to various epidemiological disciplines and to increasing numbers of geographical areas. The availability of R packages, publication of tutorial papers, and involvement of methodological experts in applied publications have contributed to an exponential increase in the number of studies that understood the benefits, and adoption, of TMLE.

笔记与分组