Statistical Models for Intercepted Data
截获数据的统计模型AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要讨论一般对象的退出与横截面选择偏差，没有面板数据估计或其他给定细分领域的明确设定。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
截获数据的统计模型
- 研究问题
- 当劣化较快的对象因达到阈值而退出总体时，如何从一次横截面观察推断年龄与劣化关系，并处理存活选择偏差？
- 方法与思路
- 作者在劣化随年龄单调增加、达到阈值即退出的模型下，推导年龄与劣化的联合抽样分布及参数和非参数似然。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，模型可利用单次横截面研究劣化过程，并为横截面与纵向估计的差异及所需偏差校正提供定量认识。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对总体更新与抽样机制、劣化路径和退出阈值的假设，以及横截面似然能识别哪些纵向行为特征。
- 阅读边界
- 仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要；单次横截面的推断依赖模型，不能声称普遍替代纵向研究；后续版本变化未知。
原文摘要
Consider a population of replaceable items of different ages, and suppose that for each item there is a certain measurable attribute that is a monotone function (perhaps random) of the item's age. To fix ideas, we refer to this attribute as deterioration and we assume that as items age their level of deterioration increases. We further assume that as the level of deterioration hits a certain threshold value (perhaps unknown), the item dies and disappears from the population, so it is not available for sampling any more. Since items that deteriorate at a slower rate live longer, any sample obtained over a short period of time would overrepresent slowly deteriorating items. Consequently, under such circumstances longitudinal studies are often needed to statistically study deterioration as a function of age. This article presents a statistical model that enables us to study the deterioration function, from a single cross-section “snapshot” of the population or some random parts of it. Specifically, this is done by deriving the joint sampling distribution of the item's age and deterioration level at the time of sampling (taking into account the model's assumptions and the bias introduced by the sampling mechanism) and deriving parametric and nonparametric likelihood functions based on this distribution. Potential applications from a variety of fields are discussed. The value of the methodology goes beyond the formulas for bias correction in the specific models. It is well known that statistical estimates based on longitudinal studies often differ from estimates based on cross-section surveys, and this article provides quantitative insight into this discrepancy. Specifically, even in situations where the models do not apply exactly, they could often provide the quantitative (and qualitative) guidelines to the form of bias correction needed for inferences about longitudinal behavior, based on cross-section surveys or surveys conducted over relatively short periods of time.