跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用贝叶斯后验近似和混合模型渐近理论,未明确对应所列领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Chun-Lung Su
Wesley O Johnson

全条件分布近似正态时的联合后验大样本近似

研究问题
当分块参数的适当标准化全条件后验渐近正态时,如何构造联合后验近似,以及参数化、组内样本量和组数如何影响极限?
方法与思路
作者从多个参数块的全条件渐近分布构造联合近似,在混合模型中比较参数化,并分别研究组内样本量与组数增长的路径。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在单向随机效应例子中,两种增长路径对方差先验权重有不同要求,并用模拟及吸烟与激素数据比较渐近近似和 Gibbs 结果。
阅读关注点
应核对从全条件到联合近似的条件、中心化参数的作用,以及组内样本量增长时的先验权重要求是否仅适用于所述例子。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;所述先验与极限结论针对特定模型,摘要不足以支持一般化。

原文摘要

Modern Bayesian statistical methods, such as Gibbs and Metropolis–Hastings sampling, were developed to liberate statisticians from the necessity of making large-sample assumptions and to facilitate the numerical approximation of problems that had previously been analytically intractable. Counter to this trend, we develop a method for constructing asymptotic joint posterior approximations based on models with k blocks of parameters and where the corresponding properly normalized full conditionals are themselves asymptotically normal. We illustrate these techniques by applying them to particular linear and generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). We also consider the relevance of different parameterizations with regard to our asymptotics. Recent work has indicated that Gibbs samplers based on so-called “centering parameterizations” result in better convergence properties for the resulting Markov chains. Our results for the one-way random-effects model shed some light on this issue. For this example, we also consider the distinction between letting the within-group sample size, n, tend to infinity versus letting the number of groups K (as defined by the random-effects part of the model) tend to infinity. Letting n grow results in a proper limiting normal distribution only when the weight on the prior for the variance component grows at a rate comparable to n. With large K, on the other hand, proper limits are obtained without this assumption, and thus it is seen that the information in the data will ultimately swamp standard prior information. We compare results based on simulated data when n and K are large. A dataset involving the effect of smoking on hormone function is analyzed using our asymptotics and compared with results based on Gibbs sampling.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文