跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用复杂调查抽样推断,回归统计量的出现不足以对应所列计量细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
J. N. K. Rao
C. F. J. Wu

复杂调查数据的重采样推断

研究问题
对于分层、多阶段及不放回抽样中的非线性统计量,如何通过统一重采样构造方差估计和反映分布偏斜的置信区间?
方法与思路
作者按不同抽样设计安排重采样与尺度调整,将 bootstrap 及部分 BRR 方法扩展到复杂调查,并研究学生化统计量形成的区间。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称线性统计量下方差估计退化为标准形式;模拟中 bootstrap 区间更贴近两尾名义错误率,但方差估计较不稳定。
阅读关注点
应核对各设计的重采样单位、尺度调整与学生化步骤,以及不放回抽样的处理,并检查区间表现和方差稳定性的比较。
阅读边界
所给 OpenAlex 索引未注明稿件版本,文本有统计量符号缺失,须查原 PDF;模拟结论限于所述设计,不能推断普遍优势。

原文摘要

Methods for standard errors and confidence intervals for nonlinear statistics —such as ratios, regression, and correlation coefficients—have been extensively studied for stratified multistage designs in which the clusters are sampled with replacement, in particular, the important special case of two sampled clusters per stratum. These methods include the customary linearization (or Taylor) method and resampling methods based on the jackknife and balanced repeated replication (BRR). Unlike the jackknife or the BRR, the linearization method is applicable to general sampling designs, but it involves a separate variance formula for each nonlinear statistic, thereby requiring additional programming efforts. Both the jackknife and the BRR use a single variance formula for all nonlinear statistics, but they are more computing-intensive. The resampling methods developed here retain these features of the jackknife and the BRR, yet permit extension to more complex designs involving sampling without replacement. The sampling designs studied include (a) stratified cluster sampling in which the clusters are sampled with replacement, (b) stratified simple random sampling without replacement, (c) unequal probability sampling without replacement, and (d) two-stage cluster sampling with equal probabilities and without replacement. Our proposed resampling methods may be viewed as extensions to complex survey samples of the bootstrap, and in the case of design (c), of the BRR as well. We obtain and study the properties of variance estimators of and confidence intervals for the parameter of interest θ, based on the bootstrap histogram of the t statistic. The variance estimators reduce to the standard ones in the special case of linear statistics. These confidence intervals take account of the skewness in the distribution of , unlike the intervals based on the normal approximation. For case (a), the sampled clusters are resampled in each stratum independently by simple random sampling with replacement, and this procedure is replicated many times. The estimate for each resampled cluster is properly scaled such that the resulting variance estimator of reduces to the standard unbiased variance estimator in the linear case. For case (b), the sampled units are resampled in each stratum as in case (a), but a different scaling is used. Different resampling procedures and scalings are employed for case (c). A two-stage resampling procedure is developed for case (d). Results of a simulation study under a stratified simple random sampling design show that the bootstrap intervals track the nominal error rate in each tail better than the intervals based on the normal approximation, but the bootstrap variance estimators are less stable than those based on the linearization or the jackknife.

笔记与分组