On Partitioning a Sample with Binary-Type Questions in Lieu of Collecting Observations
以二元问题代替精确观测的样本划分AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要中的二元问题用于搜索样本次序,并非离散选择行为建模;其余所列细分方向也缺乏明确依据。
以二元问题代替精确观测的样本划分AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The problem is to search for the t largest observations in a random sample of size n by asking binary-type questions of the people (or items) in the sample without collecting any exact data whatever. The unordered and ordered cases are both considered; in the latter case the complete ranking is of special interest. Two different criteria of optimality are considered: (a) to minimize the expected number of questions required and (b) to maximize the probability of terminating the search in at most r questions for specified r. Optimal procedures are found and compared; in some sense the solutions for these two criteria are close to each other. The analysis is nonparametric in the sense that it holds for any underlying sampling distribution, but the actual optimal procedures depend on the specified distribution. In the above, we count (the cost of) a question as one regardless of the number of people addressed; other models in which the cost depends on the number of people are considered only briefly here and will be treated in a separate paper.