Robust Empirical Bayes Estimation of Means from Stratified Samples
分层样本均值的稳健经验贝叶斯估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般分层抽样与小区域均值估计,收入和失业率示例不足以确定面板或分布效应分类。
分层样本均值的稳健经验贝叶斯估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This article considers simultaneous estimation of means from several strata, where each stratum contains a finite number of elements. For example, quite often estimates of annual incomes, unemployment rates, and so forth must be made simultaneously for many areas. Our results find application in small area estimation where very few samples are available from an individual area, and an estimate of a certain area mean or simultaneous estimates of several area means can be improved by incorporating information from similar neighboring areas. Ghosh and Meeden (1986) considered empirical Bayes estimation of the finite population mean assuming a normal superpopulation model. Their estimators generalize automatically when one estimates a vector of stratum means. This article relaxes the normality assumption and assumes instead that the posterior expectation of any stratum mean is a linear function of the sample observations. This is the so-called “posterior linearity” property as described in Ericson (1969b), Hartigan (1969), and Goldstein (1975), among others. The empirical Bayes estimators of Ghosh and Meeden (1986), however, enjoy a certain robustness property in the sense that they can be motivated with the basic assumption of posterior linearity rather than normality of the superpopulation. For a small number of strata, Monte Carlo simulations undertaken in this article clearly indicate that the Bayes risks of these empirical Bayes estimators are usually much smaller than the Bayes risk vector of sample means not only when the underlying distribution is normal, but also when they are binomial and Poisson. In addition, in the binomial case, the empirical Bayes estimators of Ghosh and Meeden perform better than some rival empirical Bayes estimators that can be developed along the lines of Morris (1983). This is quite interesting, especially since the latter uses the additional information about the form of the variance of the binomial distribution as a function of the mean. For the Poisson case, our estimators perform very closely to some of the rival estimators that can be proposed along the lines of Morris (1983) using the additional information that the variance of a Poisson distribution equals its mean. We have also found that several asymptotic (as the number of strata is large) optimality properties of the empirical Bayes estimators of Ghosh and Meeden established under the normality of the superpopulation continue to hold under the modest assumption of existence of certain superpopulation moments. This type of asymptotics is particularly suited for small area estimation where the number of small areas is very large but the sample size within each small area is typically very small. It is interesting to note that when samples of equal size are drawn from different strata, the empirical Bayes estimators of Ghosh and Meeden (1986) include as special cases the James—Stein estimators, the positive-part James—Stein estimators, and the estimators of Lindley and Smith (1972). A new feature of the present article is that the Bayes risks of such estimators, calculated without the normality assumption, indicate a clear robustness of procedures motivated originally under normality.