跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般分层抽样与小区域均值估计,收入和失业率示例不足以确定面板或分布效应分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Malay Ghosh

分层样本均值的稳健经验贝叶斯估计

研究问题
在各层样本很少的有限总体均值估计中,原本基于正态超总体的经验贝叶斯方法,能否在非正态分布下保持有利性质?
方法与思路
作者用后验线性性质替代正态性假设,研究同时估计多个层均值的经验贝叶斯方法,以模拟比较贝叶斯风险并分析多层渐近性质。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,相关估计可由后验线性性支持;正态、二项和泊松模拟显示较低贝叶斯风险,部分渐近最优性在矩条件下仍成立。
阅读关注点
核对后验线性性和超总体矩条件,区分贝叶斯风险与频率学风险,并确认层数增长、层内样本较小的渐近设定及模拟范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,刊本差异未核验;这里的稳健性主要针对正态假设放宽,不能据此推断抗异常值能力。

原文摘要

This article considers simultaneous estimation of means from several strata, where each stratum contains a finite number of elements. For example, quite often estimates of annual incomes, unemployment rates, and so forth must be made simultaneously for many areas. Our results find application in small area estimation where very few samples are available from an individual area, and an estimate of a certain area mean or simultaneous estimates of several area means can be improved by incorporating information from similar neighboring areas. Ghosh and Meeden (1986) considered empirical Bayes estimation of the finite population mean assuming a normal superpopulation model. Their estimators generalize automatically when one estimates a vector of stratum means. This article relaxes the normality assumption and assumes instead that the posterior expectation of any stratum mean is a linear function of the sample observations. This is the so-called “posterior linearity” property as described in Ericson (1969b), Hartigan (1969), and Goldstein (1975), among others. The empirical Bayes estimators of Ghosh and Meeden (1986), however, enjoy a certain robustness property in the sense that they can be motivated with the basic assumption of posterior linearity rather than normality of the superpopulation. For a small number of strata, Monte Carlo simulations undertaken in this article clearly indicate that the Bayes risks of these empirical Bayes estimators are usually much smaller than the Bayes risk vector of sample means not only when the underlying distribution is normal, but also when they are binomial and Poisson. In addition, in the binomial case, the empirical Bayes estimators of Ghosh and Meeden perform better than some rival empirical Bayes estimators that can be developed along the lines of Morris (1983). This is quite interesting, especially since the latter uses the additional information about the form of the variance of the binomial distribution as a function of the mean. For the Poisson case, our estimators perform very closely to some of the rival estimators that can be proposed along the lines of Morris (1983) using the additional information that the variance of a Poisson distribution equals its mean. We have also found that several asymptotic (as the number of strata is large) optimality properties of the empirical Bayes estimators of Ghosh and Meeden established under the normality of the superpopulation continue to hold under the modest assumption of existence of certain superpopulation moments. This type of asymptotics is particularly suited for small area estimation where the number of small areas is very large but the sample size within each small area is typically very small. It is interesting to note that when samples of equal size are drawn from different strata, the empirical Bayes estimators of Ghosh and Meeden (1986) include as special cases the James—Stein estimators, the positive-part James—Stein estimators, and the estimators of Lindley and Smith (1972). A new feature of the present article is that the Bayes risks of such estimators, calculated without the normality assumption, indicate a clear robustness of procedures motivated originally under normality.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文