跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般科学动态系统的方程参数估计,仅提及金融用途不足以归入具体金融细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xiaolei Xun
Jiguo Cao
Bani Mallick
Arnab Maity
Raymond J. Carroll

偏微分方程模型的参数估计

研究问题
当动态系统测量含误差且偏微分方程没有解析解时,如何估计具有科学解释的参数,缓解反复数值求解造成的计算负担?
方法与思路
作者以基函数展开表示动态过程,提出双层优化的参数级联方法,以及联合建模数据和方程、通过层级模型进行 MCMC 的贝叶斯方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,两种方法在模拟中的估计准确性相近,且优于所比较的其他方法;作者还使用 LIDAR 数据展示参数估计。
阅读关注点
应核对基函数与方程约束的处理、误差模型和参数可识别性、双层优化与 MCMC 的实现,以及准确性和计算成本的比较。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化。摘要未给出具体方程、识别条件或计算耗时,不能推断普遍计算优势。

原文摘要

Partial differential equation (PDE) models are commonly used to model complex dynamic systems in applied sciences such as biology and finance. The forms of these PDE models are usually proposed by experts based on their prior knowledge and understanding of the dynamic system. Parameters in PDE models often have interesting scientific interpretations, but their values are often unknown, and need to be estimated from the measurements of the dynamic system in the present of measurement errors. Most PDEs used in practice have no analytic solutions, and can only be solved with numerical methods. Currently, methods for estimating PDE parameters require repeatedly solving PDEs numerically under thousands of candidate parameter values, and thus the computational load is high. In this article, we propose two methods to estimate parameters in PDE models: a parameter cascading method and a Bayesian approach. In both methods, the underlying dynamic process modeled with the PDE model is represented via basis function expansion. For the parameter cascading method, we develop two nested levels of optimization to estimate the PDE parameters. For the Bayesian method, we develop a joint model for data and the PDE, and develop a novel hierarchical model allowing us to employ Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques to make posterior inference. Simulation studies show that the Bayesian method and parameter cascading method are comparable, and both outperform other available methods in terms of estimation accuracy. The two methods are demonstrated by estimating parameters in a PDE model from LIDAR data.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文