Design-Based Inference under Random Potential Outcomes
随机潜在结果下的基于设计的推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究随机实验、潜在结果、机制层面的因果目标及基于设计的估计和方差推断。
随机潜在结果下的基于设计的推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We study whether mechanism-level causal estimands, defined as expectations over latent stochastic environments, can be consistently recovered from a single realised randomised experiment. Identification alone does not guarantee recoverability. The target estimand averages over latent environments, whereas a single experiment provides only one realisation of such an environment. We show that suitably sparse local dependence induces an ergodic-type property under which cross-sectional averaging consistently recovers expectations over the latent outcome-generating mechanism. Under this structure, aggregate design-based estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal, and the variance becomes consistently estimable from a single experiment. Unlike classical finite-population inference, where Neyman-type variance estimators are structurally limited to conservative upper bounds, the proposed framework permits consistent variance estimation through the shift from fixed potential outcome schedules to stochastic mechanisms.