跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论两个独立回归的通用系数相等检验,未明确给出时间结构或所列领域应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

比较异方差回归模型的近似检验

研究问题
当两个独立回归模型的误差方差不相等时,如何检验其回归系数向量相同,并控制检验水平与功效?
方法与思路
作者以加权残差方差修改 Chow 统计量,通过前两阶矩匹配构造近似分布,并用估计方差比确定随机自由度。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,数值积分与功效计算表明,在考察的配置中该检验水平更接近名义水平,且具有较充分的功效。
阅读关注点
应核对权重和自由度的推导、以估计方差比替代真值的影响,以及样本量、设计矩阵和方差比的考察范围。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 摘要;性能结论限于考察配置,矩阵公式排版需核对原 PDF,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

This article addresses the problem of testing whether the vectors of regression coefficients are equal for two independent regression models when the error variances are unequal. The usual Chow statistic, appropriate when equality of variances can be assumed, is modified by replacing the pooled residual variance in the denominator with a weighted average of the residual variances from each data set. The weights are functions of the mean of the eigenvalues of W = X′ 1 X 1(X′ 1 X 1 + X′ 2 X 2)-1. Both numerator and denominator are then approximated by scalar multiples of chi-squared distributions. The parameters of these approximated distributions are chosen to equate their first two moments to those of the exact distribution. The resulting approximation for the modified Chow statistic, C*, is an F distribution with degrees of freedom that depend on the two sample sizes, the number of regressor variables, the average eigenvalue of W, and the true ratio of error variances. Since the latter is unknown, an approximate test is based on the F distribution with random degrees of freedom that result from substituting the mean squared errors of the two regressions for the respective variances. The Type I error probability of this approximation is evaluated by numerical integration. Conditioning on the estimated variance ratio, the probabilities are computed for selected configurations using a method due to J. P. Imhof; then the expectations of these probabilities with respect to the distribution of the estimated variance ratios are presented for comparison with the nominal significance level. Approximations to the power of the test are calculated for some configurations and are presented as a percentage of power of the likelihood ratio test. The results indicate that this test procedure yields a significance level closer to the nominal level than other suggested tests, and it has reasonably sufficient power across a wide range of configurations. Since the test is computationally easy to perform once the eigenvalues of W are determined, this procedure offers an excellent alternative for testing the equality of two vectors of regression coefficients.

笔记与分组