跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究工具变量因果估计对排除限制和无混杂假设违反的敏感性,并应用于教育回报。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Carlos Cinelli
Chad Hazlett

工具变量敏感性分析的遗漏变量偏误框架

研究问题
当工具变量的排除限制或无混杂假设可能失效时,如何量化多个遗漏因素需要多强,才会改变效应估计和推断结论?
方法与思路
作者用遗漏变量偏误框架定义敏感性统计量和稳健值,结合专家知识或观测变量的解释力校准边界,并展示估计与区间的变化。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称框架可同时处理工具变量的多种直接作用和混杂因素,给出最坏偏误界,并将许多敏感性判断分解至第一阶段和简约式。
阅读关注点
应核对敏感性参数的尺度、解释力界限如何校准,以及第一阶段与简约式分别分析能够支持哪些联合推断结论。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断偏误界的具体条件和校准可信度;敏感性分析本身不能验证工具变量有效性,刊本变化未提供。

原文摘要

Abstract We develop an omitted variable bias framework for sensitivity analysis of instrumental variable estimates that naturally handles multiple side effects (violations of the exclusion restriction assumption) and confounders (violations of the ignorability of the instrument assumption) of the instrument, exploits expert knowledge to bound sensitivity parameters and can be easily implemented with standard software. Specifically, we introduce sensitivity statistics for routine reporting, such as (extreme) robustness values for instrumental variables, describing the minimum strength that omitted variables need to have to change the conclusions of a study. Next, we provide visual displays that fully characterize the sensitivity of point estimates and confidence intervals to violations of the standard instrumental variable assumptions. Finally, we offer formal bounds on the worst possible bias under the assumption that the maximum explanatory power of omitted variables is no stronger than a multiple of the explanatory power of observed variables. Conveniently, many pivotal conclusions regarding the sensitivity of the instrumental variable estimate (e.g., tests against the null hypothesis of a zero causal effect) can be reached simply through separate sensitivity analyses of the effect of the instrument on the treatment (the first stage) and the effect of the instrument on the outcome (the reduced form). We apply our methods in a running example that uses proximity to college as an instrumental variable to estimate the returns to schooling.

笔记与分组