跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要是方差分析与秩检验的一般理论,“处理效应”一词未提供经济因果识别的分类依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
G. L. Thompson
L. P. Ammann

无交互双因素模型中秩变换统计量的效能

研究问题
在无交互双因素模型中,秩变换检验相对经典 F 检验具有怎样的渐近相对效率,与 Kruskal–Wallis 检验有何关系?
方法与思路
作者在 Pitman 局部备择下推导线性秩统计量的联合极限分布,将秩变换统计量写为二次型并分析非中心参数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,文章确定秩变换程序的渐近相对效率,其效能接近 Kruskal–Wallis 检验,并在单因素特例下与之相同。
阅读关注点
核对无交互模型和局部备择的设定、秩得分选择,以及方差分量估计与效能比较所依赖的正则条件。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;具体条件和效率表达式未提供,渐近局部效能不能直接代表所有有限样本下的检验功效。

原文摘要

To test for treatment effects in a two-way model when the classical assumptions of normality of errors and constancy of variance cannot be verified, Hora and Conover (1984) proposed a rank test in which the entire data set is ranked, the ranks are scored, and then the classical analysis of variance F statistic is applied to the scored ranks. They showed that the limiting null distribution of this test statistic is a chi-squared distribution divided by its degrees of freedom. Simulation results suggest that this procedure, called the rank-transform procedure, has good power properties. This article determines the asymptotic relative efficiency of the rank-transform procedure relative to the classical F statistic. To do this, vectors of linear rank statistics are shown to have a limiting multivariate normal distribution under a sequence of Pitman alternatives. This work is based on the results of Hájek (1968). The rank-transform statistic is then expressed as a quadratic form in the vectors, divided by a consistent estimator of a variance component. It is then shown that the limiting distribution of this statistic is a noncentral chi-squared distribution divided by its degrees of freedom. The efficacy of the rank-transform procedure is the noncentrality parameter of this chi-squared distribution, which is shown to be close to the efficacy of the Kruskal—Wallis test. For the special case in which the data can be represented as a one-way layout, this efficacy coincides with the Kruskal—Wallis efficacy.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文