The Estimation of Probability Densities and Cumulatives by Fourier Series Methods
用傅里叶级数估计概率密度与累积分布AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般密度与累积分布估计,未涉及经济分布效应,故不足以归入微观分位数与分布效应。
用傅里叶级数估计概率密度与累积分布AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
A class of estimators (referred to as the Fourier estimators m and m) of the probability density function f and the associated cumulative distribution function F are considered. Here m = Σmk=0 âkψk and m = Σmk=0 Âk ψk where the functions {ψk} comprise an orthogonal set with respect to weight function w(x), and the statistics âk and Âk are formed from the n unordered observations.Simple expressions are found for the mean integrated square errors, M.I.S.E., of the estimators m and m, i.e., E∫{ƒ(x) – m(x)}2ω(x)dx and E∫{F(x) – m(x)}2w(x)dx in terms of the variances of âk and Âk and the Fourier coefficients of f and F.For Fourier estimators based upon the trigonometric orthogonal functions the âk are the sample trigonometric moments. The variances and covariances of the statistics âk and Âk for these special cases are shown to be linear functions of the density f's Fourier coefficients. Therefore, simple expressions are obtained which relate the M.I.S.E. of the Fourier estimators m and m to the Fourier coefficients of the density f. These M.I.S.E. expressions both facilitate the evaluation of error for specific densities and specific truncation points m and make it possible for an optimal value of m to be estimated from the sample. The simplicity of the M.I.S.E. expressions in the trigonometric case does not seem to be paralleled by simple expressions for Var âk, and hence M.I.S.E., for other orthogonal systems, notably those based upon Hermite polynomials.A procedure for choosing the optimal number of terms of m and m is derived and the M.I.S.E. of m is compared to that of several alternative estimators of the population density. It is shown that for almost all cumulatives there exists a finite m such that m has smaller M.I.S.E. than the sample cumulative, i.e., the step function.