A Sampling Procedure for Mailed Questionnaires
邮寄问卷的抽样程序AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:材料涉及调查抽样与未回应处理,没有足够证据对应所列计量领域细分。
邮寄问卷的抽样程序AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
T HE mailed questionnaire is desirable in surveys because it is economical of money and effort, free from the interviewer's effect on the respondent, and able to reach individuals not accessible by visit or telephone. However, it has several drawbacks which can seriously limit its efficiency as a means of gathering reliable data. The mailed answers are often exposed to two kinds of bias: (1) bias arising from the respondents' misunderstanding the questions, resentment of interference in their personal affairs, or falsification for reasons connected with the subject of the survey; (2) bias of non-response, which arises from differences in the characteristic under investigation between respondents and non-respondents. The latter bias is often more pronounced in mailed questionnaires than in personal interviews and its reduction to acceptable limits will always necessitate extra effort, time and skill. The problem of non-response has already been tackled from various angles. Hansen and Hurwitz [4] studied a survey which combines the advantages of mailed questionnaires and personal interviews. The plan first utilizes the economies involved in the use of questionnaires by mailing them to a sample of the population under investigation. A follow-up is then carried out by interviewing a subsample of the non-respondents to the mail canvass, thus eliminating substantially the bias of non-response in the first stage. The optimum allocation of the mail and field samples is obtained by requiring minimum cost for an assigned precision. The sizes of the two samples naturally depend on the rate of non-response to the mailed questionnaire and the variances of the characteristic under investigation both among the whole population and among the non-respondents. These parameters are assumed to be known from previous experience. Politz and Simmons [5] devised a technique for circumventing the need for call-backs in interviewing surveys. Each person in the sample is visited onlce, at a time determined at random. From each person interviewed information is obtained as to whether he was at home at certain times, which leads to an estimate of the proportion of the time he is at home during the interviewing hours. The sample estimate is produced by weighting the results for each group that spends the same proportion of time at home during the interviewing hours by the reciprocal of the estimated percentage of time that the members of this group are at home.