Geometrizing rates of convergence under local differential privacy constraints
局部差分隐私约束下收敛速率的几何刻画AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要是局部差分隐私下的通用统计决策理论,未指向所列经济计量细分方向。
局部差分隐私约束下收敛速率的几何刻画AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We study the problem of estimating a functional $\theta ({\mathbb{P}})$ of an unknown probability distribution ${\mathbb{P}}\in {\mathcal{P}}$ in which the original iid sample $X_{1},\dots ,X_{n}$ is kept private even from the statistician via an $\alpha $-local differential privacy constraint. Let $\omega _{\mathrm{TV}}$ denote the modulus of continuity of the functional $\theta $ over ${\mathcal{P}}$ with respect to total variation distance. For a large class of loss functions $l$ and a fixed privacy level $\alpha $, we prove that the privatized minimax risk is equivalent to $l(\omega _{\mathrm{TV}}(n^{-1/2}))$ to within constants, under regularity conditions that are satisfied, in particular, if $\theta $ is linear and ${\mathcal{P}}$ is convex. Our results complement the theory developed by Donoho and Liu (1991) with the nowadays highly relevant case of privatized data. Somewhat surprisingly, the difficulty of the estimation problem in the private case is characterized by $\omega _{\mathrm{TV}}$, whereas, it is characterized by the Hellinger modulus of continuity if the original data $X_{1},\dots ,X_{n}$ are available. We also find that for locally private estimation of linear functionals over a convex model a simple sample mean estimator, based on independently and binary privatized observations, always achieves the minimax rate. We further provide a general recipe for choosing the functional parameter in the optimal binary privatization mechanisms and illustrate the general theory in numerous examples. Our theory allows us to quantify the price to be paid for local differential privacy in a large class of estimation problems. This price appears to be highly problem specific.