跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确围绕组内干扰、同伴效应、潜在结果与随机化推断展开。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xinran Li
Peng Ding
Qian Lin
Dawei Yang
Jun S. Liu

同伴效应的随机化推断

研究问题
当同组成员相互影响、无干扰假设不成立时,如何定义并推断不同同伴数量与类型下的效应,为宿舍分配政策提供依据?
方法与思路
作者以潜在结果定义同伴效应,利用学生随机分配宿舍的设计建立随机化推断框架,并避免对结果分布设定参数模型。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称框架可处理任意同伴数量与类型,并以中国一所高校的宿舍分配为应用;分析为校方政策提供实践指导。
阅读关注点
应核对潜在结果如何依赖同伴构成、允许的干扰范围、宿舍随机分配机制,以及目标效应、检验与区间构造的具体定义。
阅读边界
所给 OpenAlex 文本含作者信息和摘要;未说明完整干扰条件或效应数值,无参数分布假设也不代表无需其他假设,刊本变化未知。

原文摘要

Xinran Lia, Peng Dingb*, Qian Linc, Dawei Yangd & Jun S. Liuaa Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; b Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA; c Center for Statistical Science, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P. R. China; d Bureau of Personnel of Chinese Academy of Sciences & School of Education of Peking University, Beijing, P. R. ChinaSupplementary materials for this article are available online. Please go to www.tandfonline.com/r/JASA.CONTACT Peng Ding pengdingpku@berkeley.edu Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.AbstractMany previous causal inference studies require no interference, that is, the potential outcomes of a unit do not depend on the treatments of other units. However, this no-interference assumption becomes unreasonable when a unit interacts with other units in the same group or cluster. In a motivating application, a top Chinese university admits students through two channels: the college entrance exam (also known as Gaokao) and recommendation (often based on Olympiads in various subjects). The university randomly assigns students to dorms, each of which hosts four students. Students within the same dorm live together and have extensive interactions. Therefore, it is likely that peer effects exist and the no-interference assumption does not hold. It is important to understand peer effects, because they give useful guidance for future roommate assignment to improve the performance of students. We define peer effects using potential outcomes. We then propose a randomization-based inference framework to study peer effects with arbitrary numbers of peers and peer types. Our inferential procedure does not assume any parametric model on the outcome distribution. Our analysis gives useful practical guidance for policy makers of the university. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文