跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究空间生存分析,未提供所列经济学细分方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

A Unified Framework for Fitting Bayesian Semiparametric Models to Arbitrarily Censored Survival Data, Including Spatially Referenced Data

任意删失生存数据的贝叶斯半参数建模统一框架:兼顾空间信息

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Haiming Zhou
Timothy Hanson

任意删失生存数据的贝叶斯半参数建模统一框架:兼顾空间信息

研究问题
如何在统一框架中分析多种删失与左截断并存的生存数据,同时处理精确地理位置或仅知所属区域的空间信息?
方法与思路
作者以变换 Bernstein 多项式先验建模基准生存函数,统一拟合比例风险、比例优势和加速失效时间模型,并提供软件实现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称框架兼容多类删失、左截断及空间位置,并支持变量选择;所示研究中,比例优势和加速失效时间模型往往拟合更好。
阅读关注点
应核对各类删失与左截断的似然处理、空间依赖及先验设定,以及残差诊断、模型比较和软件实现的适用条件。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,不能推断刊本变化;摘要未给出具体先验条件或比较数值,所述拟合优势不能推广至所有数据。

原文摘要

A comprehensive, unified approach to modeling arbitrarily censored spatial survival data is presented for the three most commonly used semiparametric models: proportional hazards, proportional odds, and accelerated failure time. Unlike many other approaches, all manner of censored survival times are simultaneously accommodated including uncensored, interval censored, current-status, left and right censored, and mixtures of these. Left-truncated data are also accommodated leading to models for time-dependent covariates. Both georeferenced (location exactly observed) and areally observed (location known up to a geographic unit such as a county) spatial locations are handled; formal variable selection makes model selection especially easy. Model fit is assessed with conditional Cox–Snell residual plots, and model choice is carried out via log pseudo marginal likelihood (LPML) and deviance information criterion (DIC). Baseline survival is modeled with a novel transformed Bernstein polynomial prior. All models are fit via a new function which calls efficient compiled C++ in the R package spBayesSurv. The methodology is broadly illustrated with simulations and real data applications. An important finding is that proportional odds and accelerated failure time models often fit significantly better than the commonly used proportional hazards model. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文