On Choosing Mixture Components via Non-Local Priors
通过非局部先验选择混合模型的成分数AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般混合模型的贝叶斯成分选择,未明确涉及结构估计、离散选择或经济分布效应。
通过非局部先验选择混合模型的成分数AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Summary Choosing the number of mixture components remains an elusive challenge. Model selection criteria can be either overly liberal or conservative and return poorly separated components of limited practical use. We formalize non-local priors (NLPs) for mixtures and show how they lead to well-separated components with non-negligible weight, interpretable as distinct subpopulations. We also propose an estimator for posterior model probabilities under local priors and NLPs, showing that Bayes factors are ratios of posterior-to-prior empty cluster probabilities. The estimator is widely applicable and helps to set thresholds to drop unoccupied components in overfitted mixtures. We suggest default prior parameters based on multimodality for normal–T-mixtures and minimal informativeness for categorical outcomes. We characterize theoretically the NLP-induced sparsity, derive tractable expressions and algorithms. We fully develop normal, binomial and product binomial mixtures but the theory, computation and principles hold more generally. We observed a serious lack of sensitivity of the Bayesian information criterion, insufficient parsimony of the Akaike information criterion and a local prior, and a mixed behaviour of the singular Bayesian information criterion. We also considered overfitted mixtures; their performance was competitive but depended on tuning parameters. Under our default prior elicitation NLPs offered a good compromise between sparsity and power to detect meaningfully separated components.