跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦广义线性模型的缺失数据估计,未明确涉及因果效应、离散选择或其他所列专门领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Joseph G. Ibrahim
Stuart R. Lipsitz
Ming-Hui Chen

缺失机制不可忽略时广义线性模型中的协变量缺失

研究问题
当响应变量完全观测、协变量存在不可忽略缺失时,如何估计广义线性模型参数,并评估缺失机制设定的影响?
方法与思路
作者用逐维条件分布建模缺失指标与协变量分布;分类协变量采用闭式EM步骤,连续协变量采用结合Gibbs抽样的蒙特卡洛EM。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称给出了不可忽略协变量缺失下的EM计算方法,并通过模拟和黑色素瘤临床试验数据展示方法,强调模型检查与敏感性分析。
阅读关注点
应核对联合分布的具体设定、参数可识别条件、Gibbs抽样与EM收敛处理,以及敏感性分析如何改变缺失机制并比较结果。
阅读边界
仅据所给Crossref摘要解读。摘要明确指出缺失机制的参数形式无法由数据检验;通过模型检查不代表机制正确,具体识别条件与数值结果未说明。

原文摘要

Summary We propose a method for estimating parameters in generalized linear models with missing covariates and a non-ignorable missing data mechanism. We use a multinomial model for the missing data indicators and propose a joint distribution for them which can be written as a sequence of one-dimensional conditional distributions, with each one-dimensional conditional distribution consisting of a logistic regression. We allow the covariates to be either categorical or continuous. The joint covariate distribution is also modelled via a sequence of one-dimensional conditional distributions, and the response variable is assumed to be completely observed. We derive the E- and M-steps of the EM algorithm with non-ignorable missing covariate data. For categorical covariates, we derive a closed form expression for the E- and M-steps of the EM algorithm for obtaining the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs). For continuous covariates, we use a Monte Carlo version of the EM algorithm to obtain the MLEs via the Gibbs sampler. Computational techniques for Gibbs sampling are proposed and implemented. The parametric form of the assumed missing data mechanism itself is not ‘testable' from the data, and thus the non-ignorable modelling considered here can be viewed as a sensitivity analysis concerning a more complicated model. Therefore, although a model may have ‘passed' the tests for a certain missing data mechanism, this does not mean that we have captured, even approximately, the correct missing data mechanism. Hence, model checking for the missing data mechanism and sensitivity analyses play an important role in this problem and are discussed in detail. Several simulations are given to demonstrate the methodology. In addition, a real data set from a melanoma cancer clinical trial is presented to illustrate the methods proposed.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文