A Review of Composite Sampling Methods
混合采样方法综述AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论跨学科的混合采样与测量成本,没有明确对应所列经济计量细分领域,故暂不归类。
混合采样方法综述AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
A composite is formed by collecting multiple sample units and combining them in their entirety or in part, to form a new sample. The sample units that make up the composite may retain their integrity or be homogenized through physical processes such as ball milling, sieving, shaking, or centrifuging. One or more subsequent measurements are taken on the composite and the information on the sample units is lost. This counterintuitive loss of information has fueled opposition to composite sampling, while the methodology's adherents find their motivation in its ability to reduce measurement costs for many classes of problems. This article reviews the scientific literature related to the development of composite sampling methods. The literature on compositing exists only as a compendium derived from disparate disciplines in which terms such as compositing, group screening, pooling, and weighing designs are used. The goal of this review is to synthesize this body of literature. The articles reviewed are limited to those that offer original applications or methodologies. A novel application in numerical regularization, is illustrated using data from an environmental investigation into mercury contamination at a waste disposal site in New Mexico. What is unusual about these data is the existence of measurements at both the composite and sample unit levels, thus allowing an opportunity to evaluate estimates based on composite sampling methods.