跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用分类与标签噪声,未涉及离散选择模型或其他所列经济学领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Timothy I Cannings
Yingying Fan
Richard J Samworth

训练标签不完美时的分类

研究问题
当训练标签的误标概率同时依赖特征和真实类别时,分类器预测干净测试数据的风险、一致性与收敛速度如何变化?
方法与思路
作者把干净标签下的超额风险与预测噪声标签的超额风险联系起来,并进一步分析近邻、支持向量机和线性判别方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在更强条件下,近邻与支持向量机的超额风险收敛率不变;部分情形下标签噪声甚至改善表现,并给出模拟支持。
阅读关注点
应核对风险界和一致性所需的噪声条件、不同分类器结论的适用范围,以及线性判别分析中类别先验的作用。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,不能把特定条件下的稳健性推广到任意误标机制,也无法判断标签噪声改善表现的具体情形。

原文摘要

Summary We study the effect of imperfect training data labels on the performance of classification methods. In a general setting, where the probability that an observation in the training dataset is mislabelled may depend on both the feature vector and the true label, we bound the excess risk of an arbitrary classifier trained with imperfect labels in terms of its excess risk for predicting a noisy label. This reveals conditions under which a classifier trained with imperfect labels remains consistent for classifying uncorrupted test data points. Furthermore, under stronger conditions, we derive detailed asymptotic properties for the popular $k$-nearest neighbour, support vector machine and linear discriminant analysis classifiers. One consequence of these results is that the $k$-nearest neighbour and support vector machine classifiers are robust to imperfect training labels, in the sense that the rate of convergence of the excess risk of these classifiers remains unchanged; in fact, our theoretical and empirical results even show that in some cases, imperfect labels may improve the performance of these methods. The linear discriminant analysis classifier is shown to be typically inconsistent in the presence of label noise unless the prior probabilities of the classes are equal. Our theoretical results are supported by a simulation study.

笔记与分组