Aggregate Data, Ecological Regression, and Voting Transitions
汇总数据、生态回归与投票转移AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以选民在离散投票选项间的转移概率为对象,并提出多项概率模型。
反馈分类问题汇总数据、生态回归与投票转移AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Voting data typically comprise the marginal distributions of votes cast at two successive elections. The fact that these obtain separately for many voting precincts or areas enables one to estimate the actual transition probabilities for movements between the options available to the voter at each election. An aggregated compound multinomial model is proposed. This allows log-linear dependence on various covariates and specifies a simple and illuminating structure of random effects. The information in such aggregated data is compared with that which would obtain had all of the transitions been observed. The model is applicable to many other types of aggregated data and meets many of the difficulties inherent in “ecological regression.” It is illustrated with an analysis of the British European election of 1984.