Validation of linear regression models
线性回归模型的验证AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用回归模型验证,未提供因果、面板或结构估计方向的明确依据。
线性回归模型的验证AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
A new test is proposed in order to verify that a regression function, say $g$, has a prescribed (linear) parametric form. This procedure is based on the large sample behavior of an empirical $L^2$-distance between $g$ and the subspace $U$ spanned by the regression functions to be verified. The asymptotic distribution of the test statistic is shown to be normal with parameters depending only on the variance of the observations and the $L^2$-distance between the regression function $g$ and the model space $U$. Based on this result, a test is proposed for the hypothesis that "$g$ is not in a preassigned $L^2$-neighborhood of $U$," whichallows the "verification" of the model $U$ at a controlled type I error rate. The suggested procedure is very easy to apply because of its asymptotic normal law and the simple form of the test statistic. In particular, it does not require nonparametric estimators of the regression function and hence, the test does not depend on the subjective choice of smoothing parameters.