Marginal singularity and the benefits of labels in covariate-shift
协变量偏移中的边际奇异性与标签收益AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究机器学习分类与迁移理论,离散标签本身不足以归入经济学离散选择。
协变量偏移中的边际奇异性与标签收益AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Transfer Learning addresses common situations in Machine Leaning where little or no labeled data is available for a target prediction problem—corresponding to a distribution Q, but much labeled data is available from some related but different data distribution P. This work is concerned with the fundamental limits of transfer, that is, the limits in target performance in terms of (1) sample sizes from P and Q, and (2) differences in data distributions P, Q. In particular, we aim to address practical questions such as how much target data from Q is sufficient given a certain amount of related data from P, and how to optimally sample such target data for labeling. We present new minimax results for transfer in nonparametric classification (i.e., for situations where little is known about the target classifier), under the common assumption that the marginal distributions of covariates differ between P and Q (often termed covariate-shift). Our results are first to concisely capture the relative benefits of source and target labeled data in these settings through information-theoretic limits. Namely, we show that the benefits of target labels are tightly controlled by a transfer-exponent γ that encodes how singular Q is locally with respect to P, and interestingly paints a more favorable picture of transfer than what might be believed from insights from previous work. In fact, while previous work rely largely on refinements of traditional metrics and divergences between distributions, and often only yield a coarse view of when transfer is possible or not, our analysis—in terms of γ—reveals a continuum of new regimes ranging from easy to hard transfer. We then address the practical question of how to efficiently sample target data to label, by showing that a recently proposed semi-supervised procedure—based on k-NN classification, can be refined to adapt to unknown γ and, therefore, requests target labels only when beneficial, while achieving nearly minimax-optimal transfer rates without knowledge of distributional parameters. Of independent interest, we obtain new minimax-optimality results for vanilla k-NN classification in regimes with nonuniform marginals.