Macroprudential Policy and Downside Risk: Regime-Dependent Effects of Capital Regulation
宏观审慎政策与下行风险:资本监管的状态依赖效应AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用门槛 VAR 和脉冲响应研究资本监管,并以系统性压力及下行风险为背景,支持宏观冲击与系统性风险分类。
宏观审慎政策与下行风险:资本监管的状态依赖效应AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper employs a Threshold Bayesian Vector Autoregression (TBVAR) to estimate the regime-dependent macroeconomic effects of capital regulation in Hungary. Using the Factor-based Index of Systemic Stress (FISS) as the threshold variable, the model identifies normal and stress regimes consistent with the occasionally binding constraints literature. The TBVAR offers a practical multivariate alternative to Growth-at-Risk for data-constrained economies. Generalised impulse responses reveal a pronounced asymmetry: releasing regulatory capital during stress raises GDP growth at the peak, with effects persisting for roughly twenty months, while the cost of accumulating capital in the normal regime is economically negligible. These findings are robust to alternative Cholesky orderings, sample periods, and credit variable definitions, providing direct empirical support for the countercyclical operation of the capital buffer.