A Practical Interval Estimation Method for Spectral Density Function
谱密度函数的实用区间估计方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究时间序列的谱密度、频域重抽样与依赖过程,直接属于时间序列方向。
谱密度函数的实用区间估计方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The spectral density function can play a key role in time series analysis, where nonparametric interval estimation of the spectral density is a fundamental issue. However, the prevailing pointwise interval methods for spectral densities, including chi-square approximation and frequency domain bootstrap (FDB), can be misleading in practice, perhaps more so than appreciated, as confidence intervals often exhibit low coverage accuracy as well as high sensitivity to tuning parameters. To provide a practical alternative, we propose a new hybrid method that combines the strengths of empirical likelihood (EL) and FDB. The method involves developing an EL statistic for spectral density inference along with a corresponding bootstrap approximation under time dependence, where we allow for general time processes as well as for two different types of kernel smoothing found in application (so-called A- or K-windows). Such windows require differing theories and implementations in practice. As an advantage, the FDB-EL procedure is formally valid under mild conditions for application to a broad range of processes, including both linear and nonlinear time series. Simulation studies demonstrate that FDB-EL-based confidence intervals are effective compared to other methods, as intervals maintain good coverage accuracy while being less sensitive to bandwidth parameters. The confidence interval procedure is illustrated with an application to studying the wind spectrum. Extension to simultaneous confidence intervals has also been discussed.