跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要分析通用高维条件独立检验和变量选择功效,条件关联目标本身不足以归入因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Wenshuo Wang
Lucas Janson

条件随机化检验与knockoff的高维功效分析

研究问题
当变量维度与样本量之比趋于正常数时,条件随机化检验及model-X knockoff具有怎样的渐近功效,统计量和额外数据如何影响它?
方法与思路
作者在高维线性模型中,针对边际协方差、最小二乘和lasso统计量推导功效表达式,并分析无标签数据与回顾性抽样。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要给出条件随机化检验、其p值变量选择及knockoff的渐近功效公式;在部分独立协变量情形中称前者可能具有功效优势。
阅读关注点
应核对信号尺度、协变量分布、统计量的可定义条件、多重检验规则,以及理论比较所涵盖的独立协变量和抽样情形。
阅读边界
仅据所给Crossref摘要,无法判断具体功效公式及适用条件;所述比较限于考察的模型情形,不能推断某方法普遍占优。

原文摘要

Summary In many scientific applications, researchers aim to relate a response variable $Y$ to a set of potential explanatory variables $X = (X_1,\dots,X_p)$, and start by trying to identify variables that contribute to this relationship. In statistical terms, this goal can be understood as trying to identify those $X_j$ on which $Y$ is conditionally dependent. Sometimes it is of value to simultaneously test for each $j$, which is more commonly known as variable selection. The conditional randomization test, CRT, and model-X knockoffs are two recently proposed methods that respectively perform conditional independence testing and variable selection by computing, for each $X_j$, any test statistic on the data and assessing that test statistic’s significance, by comparing it with test statistics computed on synthetic variables generated using knowledge of the distribution of $X$. The main contribution of this article is the analysis of the power of these methods in a high-dimensional linear model, where the ratio of the dimension $p$ to the sample size $n$ converges to a positive constant. We give explicit expressions for the asymptotic power of the CRT, variable selection with CRT $p$-values, and model-X knockoffs, each with a test statistic based on the marginal covariance, the least squares coefficient or the lasso. One useful application of our analysis is direct theoretical comparison of the asymptotic powers of variable selection with CRT $p$-values and model-X knockoffs; in the instances with independent covariates that we consider, the CRT probably dominates knockoffs. We also analyse the power gain from using unlabelled data in the CRT when limited knowledge of the distribution of $X$ is available, as well as the power of the CRT when samples are collected retrospectively.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文