跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究随机实验及匹配准实验中的个体处理效应,并以效应分布和分位数为推断对象。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Zhe Chen
Xinran Li

不同实验中个体处理效应分布与分位数的增强推断

研究问题
个体处理效应无法由观测数据直接识别时,如何改进随机化推断,减轻效应分布与分位数推断中的保守性?
方法与思路
作者分别合并处理组与对照组内部的效应推断,以及控制具有大效应的实际受处理单位数量,并扩展至抽样实验与匹配准实验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称两种方法提高既有分布与分位数推断的功效,模拟与应用显示明显收益,两种思路在扩展场景中具有互补作用。
阅读关注点
应核对推断对象、有限样本有效性的条件、两种改进如何限制最坏情形,以及匹配准实验扩展所需的额外要求。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 摘要,不推断刊本变化;改进推断不等于点识别个体效应,摘要未说明功效增益数值及准实验适用条件。

原文摘要

Understanding treatment effect heterogeneity has become increasingly important in many fields. In this paper we study distributions and quantiles of individual treatment effects to provide a more comprehensive and robust understanding of treatment effects beyond usual averages, despite they are more challenging to infer due to nonidentifiability from the observed data. Recent randomization-based approaches offer finite-sample valid inference for treatment effect distributions and quantiles in both completely randomized and stratified randomized experiments, but they can be overly conservative by assuming the worst-case scenario where units with large effects are all assigned to the treated (or control) group. We introduce two improved methods to enhance the power of these existing approaches. The first method reinterprets existing approaches as inferring treatment effects among only treated or control units, and then combines the inference for treated and control units to infer treatment effects for all units. The second method explicitly controls for the actual number of treated units with large effects. Both simulation and application demonstrate the substantial gain from the improved methods. These methods are further extended to sampling-based experiments as well as quasi-experiments from matching, in which the ideas for both improved methods can play critical and complementary roles.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文