跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要虽使用合成控制,但目标是医院风险标准化比较,未明确提出因果效应识别或其他所列细分方向的研究问题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yifei Wang
Daniel J. Tancredi

目标总体仅有边际分布时的联合间接标准化

研究问题
目标医院仅提供协变量边际分布、参考医院提供完整信息时,如何进行多协变量调整后的比较并量化估计不确定性?
方法与思路
作者结合迭代比例拟合与合成控制构造标准化方法,再用合成控制权重的随机 Dirichlet 参数化估计不确定性区间。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该方法处理目标总体缺少个体数据所引入的不确定性,并通过高辐射剂量计算机断层检查的医院比较与模拟展示。
阅读关注点
应核对边际分布如何约束联合列联表、参考医院权重如何确定,以及随机权重区间能否涵盖联合分布重建的不确定性。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;联合分布重建条件和区间覆盖表现未说明,也不能据此作因果解释。

原文摘要

It is a common interest in medicine to determine whether a hospital meets a benchmark created from an aggregate reference population, after accounting for differences in distributions of multiple covariates. Due to the difficulties of collecting individual-level data, however, it is often the case that only marginal distributions of the covariates are available, making covariate-adjusted comparison challenging. We propose and evaluate a novel approach for conducting indirect standardization when only marginal covariate distributions of the studied hospital are known, but complete information is available for the reference hospitals. We do this with the aid of two existing methods: iterative proportional fit, which estimates the cells of a contingency table when only marginal sums are known, and synthetic control methods, which create a counterfactual control group using a weighted combination of potential control groups. The proper application of these existing methods for indirect standardization would require accounting for the statistical uncertainties induced by a situation where no individual-level data is collected from the studied population. We address this need with a novel method which uses a random Dirichlet parametrization of the synthetic control weights to estimate uncertainty intervals for the standard incidence ratio. We demonstrate our novel methods by estimating hospital-level standardized incidence ratios for comparing the adjusted probability of computed tomography examinations with high radiations doses, relative to a reference standard and we evalauate out methods in a simulation study.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文