跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用独立横截面调查而非同一个体面板,重点是通用缺失数据处理,没有足够依据归入所列方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Andrew Gelman
Gary King
Chuanhai Liu

未提问与未回答:多项调查的多重插补

研究问题
在多次独立横截面调查中,部分问题整项未被询问、部分个体又未作答时,如何联合补齐信息并估计总体量。
方法与思路
作者在多重插补中加入个体与调查层面的层级回归,将抽样权重所依据的变量纳入分析,再对观测和插补响应重新加权。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法处理跨调查的缺题与个体缺答,并提出比较插补和非插补数据的拟合诊断,以选前民意调查展示应用。
阅读关注点
应核对两类缺失各自需要的假设、调查间信息共享的模型限制,以及权重处理和插补不确定性如何进入最终总体估计。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;缺失机制、方差合成及诊断能力未说明,不能推断其他版本变化。

原文摘要

We present a method of analyzing a series of independent cross-sectional surveys in which some questions are not answered in some surveys and some respondents do not answer some of the questions posed. The method is also applicable to a single survey in which different questions are asked or different sampling methods are used in different strata or clusters. Our method involves multiply imputing the missing items and questions by adding to existing methods of imputation designed for single surveys a hierarchical regression model that allows covariates at the individual and survey levels. Information from survey weights is exploited by including in the analysis the variables on which the weights were based, and then reweighting individual responses (observed and imputed) to estimate population quantities. We also develop diagnostics for checking the fit of the imputation model based on comparing imputed data to nonimputed data. We illustrate with the example that motivated this project: a study of pre-election public opinion polls in which not all the questions of interest are asked in all the surveys, so that it is infeasible to impute within each survey separately.

笔记与分组