跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确围绕随机临床试验中的异质处理效应和亚群疗效检验展开。

反馈分类问题

Leveraging External Data for Testing Experimental Therapies with Biomarker Interactions in Randomized Clinical Trials

利用外部数据检验随机临床试验中的生物标志物交互效应

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Boyu Ren
Federico Ferrari
Sandra Fortini
Steffen Ventz
Lorenzo Trippa

利用外部数据检验随机临床试验中的生物标志物交互效应

研究问题
当新疗法效果集中于某些患者亚群时,如何借助外部研究或健康记录提高随机试验检验功效,同时维持假阳性率控制?
方法与思路
作者提出利用外部数据的置换程序,在随机试验结束后检验疗法在任何亚群都不改善主要结果的原假设,并讨论最优性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称程序提升功效,并在外部数据存在未测混杂或人群差异等情形下控制假阳性率,辅以渐近分析、模拟和胶质母细胞瘤案例。
阅读关注点
应核对“任何亚群均无改善”的假设定义、外部数据如何进入置换统计量,以及错误率控制和最优性分别依赖的条件与标准。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未核实;摘要未说明具体置换机制,容忍外部数据偏差不等于无条件保证功效提升。

原文摘要

In oncology the efficacy of novel therapeutics often differs across patient subgroups, and these variations are difficult to predict during the initial phases of the drug development process. The relation between the power of randomized clinical trials and heterogeneous treatment effects has been discussed by several authors. In particular, false negative results are likely to occur when the treatment effects concentrate in a subpopulation but the study design did not account for potential heterogeneous treatment effects. The use of external data from completed clinical studies and electronic health records has the potential to improve decision-making throughout the development of new therapeutics, from early-stage trials to registration. Here we discuss the use of external data to evaluate experimental treatments with potential heterogeneous treatment effects. We introduce a permutation procedure to test, at the completion of a randomized clinical trial, the null hypothesis that the experimental therapy does not improve the primary outcomes in any subpopulation. The permutation test leverages the available external data to increase power. Also, the procedure controls the false positive rate at the desired $α$-level without restrictive assumptions on the external data, for example, in scenarios with unmeasured confounders, different pre-treatment patient profiles in the trial population compared to the external data, and other discrepancies between the trial and the external data. We illustrate that the permutation test is optimal according to an interpretable criteria and discuss examples based on asymptotic results and simulations, followed by a retrospective analysis of individual patient-level data from a collection of glioblastoma clinical trials.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文