跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用主分层评估不同治疗下的潜在生存亚组及异质性治疗效果。

反馈分类问题

Latent Class Survival Models Linked by Principal Stratification to Investigate Heterogenous Survival Subgroups Among Individuals With Early-Stage Kidney Cancer

以主分层连接潜在类别生存模型:早期肾癌患者的异质性生存亚组

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Brian L. Egleston
Robert G. Uzzo
Yu-Ning Wong

以主分层连接潜在类别生存模型:早期肾癌患者的异质性生存亚组

研究问题
如何识别早期肾癌患者在两种治疗下具有不同死亡风险的潜在亚组,并评估哪些患者可能从积极治疗中受益或受损?
方法与思路
作者以主分层框架连接两治疗组中的潜在生存类别,结合 Weibull 混合模型,估计高低死亡风险亚组的比例与特征。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要强调,主分层所依据的生存类别属于潜变量,并将方法用于 SEER-Medicare 数据,以研究治疗效果的异质性。
阅读关注点
核对两种治疗下潜在类别的联合识别、治疗分配与删失的处理,以及 Weibull 混合设定如何影响受益或受损亚组的判断。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,不能推断刊本变化。摘要未说明因果识别假设、潜在类别识别条件或实际治疗效果数值。

原文摘要

Rates of kidney cancer have been increasing, with small incidental tumors experiencing the fastest growth rates. Much of the increase could be due to increased use of CT scans, MRIs, and ultrasounds for unrelated conditions. Many tumors might never have been detected or become symptomatic in the past. This suggests that many patients might benefit from less aggressive therapy, such as active surveillance by which tumors are surgically removed only if they become sufficiently large. However, it has been difficult for clinicians to identify subgroups of patients for whom treatment might be especially beneficial or harmful. In this work, we use a principal stratification framework to estimate the proportion and characteristics of individuals who have large or small hazard rates of death in two treatment arms. This allows us to assess who might be helped or harmed by aggressive treatment. We also use Weibull mixture models. This work differs from much previous work in that the survival classes upon which principal stratification is based are latent variables. That is, survival class is not an observed variable. We apply this work using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare claims data. Clinicians can use our methods for investigating treatments with heterogeneous effects.

笔记与分组