跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究随机实验不依从下的因果效应,并讨论排除限制、单调性与工具变量。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Guido W. Imbens
Donald B. Rubin

存在不依从的随机实验中因果效应的贝叶斯推断

研究问题
当二元处理指派随机但实际接受处理不可忽略,且两者均被观测时,如何对存在不依从的实验进行因果效应推断?
方法与思路
作者提出贝叶斯推断方法,用EM和数据增广开展后验估计,并考察工具变量分析中排除限制与单调性假设的作用。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法可产生与意向处理及工具变量分析有实质差异的有效推断,且在简单模拟设置中改善了频率学运行特性。
阅读关注点
应核对因果目标、先验与不依从类型的建模方式,检查排除限制、单调性及似然平坦区域如何影响识别和后验推断。
阅读边界
仅据OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;先验、完整识别条件和改善幅度未说明,不能将简单模拟结论视为普遍优势。

原文摘要

For most of this century, randomization has been a cornerstone of scientific experimentation, especially when dealing with humans as experimental units. In practice, however, noncompliance is relatively common with human subjects, complicating traditional theories of inference that require adherence to the random treatment assignment. In this paper we present Bayesian inferential methods for causal estimands in the presence of noncompliance, when the binary treatment assignment is random and hence ignorable, but the binary treatment received is not ignorable. We assume that both the treatment assigned and the treatment received are observed. We describe posterior estimation using EM and data augmentation algorithms. Also, we investigate the role of two assumptions often made in econometric instrumental variables analyses, the exclusion restriction and the monotonicity assumption, without which the likelihood functions generally have substantial regions of maxima. We apply our procedures to real and artificial data, thereby demonstrating the technology and showing that our new methods can yield valid inferences that differ in practically important ways from those based on previous methods for analysis in the presence of noncompliance, including intention-to-treat analyses and analyses based on econometric instrumental variables techniques. Finally, we perform a simulation to investigate the operating characteristics of the competing procedures in a simple setting, which indicates relatively dramatic improvements in frequency operating characteristics attainable using our Bayesian procedures.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文