跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究中介分析中的受控直接效应、因果模型及混杂调整。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
S. Vansteelandt

利用逻辑斯蒂结构直接效应模型估计二元结局的受控直接效应

研究问题
如何评估暴露对二元结局不经由指定中介产生的影响,并处理暴露可能影响中介与结局之间混杂因素的情形?
方法与思路
作者发展与逻辑斯蒂结构直接效应模型相关的新因果模型,在两类关系的混杂因素均已测量的假设下研究识别与有效估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新模型缓解相关模型的估计困难,模拟表现适当,并讨论病例对照研究扩展及对时变混杂调整的启示。
阅读关注点
应核对受控直接效应的定义、完整识别条件、估计程序,以及连续中介、暴露后混杂和病例对照抽样的处理方式。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;已测量全部相关混杂因素是摘要明确的假设,其他条件及模拟数值未说明。

原文摘要

We consider the problem of assessing whether an exposure affects a dichotomous outcome other than by modifying a given mediator. The standard approach, logistic regression adjusting for both exposure and the mediator, is known to be biased in the presence of confounders for the mediator-outcome relationship. Because additional regression adjustment for such confounders is only justified when they are not affected by the exposure, inverse probability weighting has been advocated, but is not ideally tailored to mediators that are continuous or have strong measured predictors. We overcome this limitation by developing inference for a novel class of causal models that are closely related to Robins’ logistic structural direct effect models, but do not inherit their difficulties of estimation. We study identification and efficient estimation under the assumption that all confounders for the exposure-outcome and mediator-outcome relationships have been measured, and find adequate performance in simulation studies. We discuss extensions to case-control studies and relevant implications for the generic problem of adjustment for time-varying confounding.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文