跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是通用多源汇总数据融合;孟德尔随机化仅为应用之一,尚不足以将整体方法限定为因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ruoyu Wang
Qihua Wang
Wang Miao

存在有偏来源时基于汇总统计量的稳健融合与提取

研究问题
多个数据来源可能因抽样、污染或模型误设产生偏差,且事先不知道哪些来源无偏时,如何稳健地整合汇总估计信息?
方法与思路
作者提出仅使用汇总统计量的融合与提取估计量,在整合多源信息的同时选择无偏来源,并分析来源数和参数维度增长的情形。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,估计量一致、渐近正态并与仅用无偏来源的理想估计量渐近等价,还能以趋近于一的概率正确选择无偏来源。
阅读关注点
应核对无偏来源所需的数量或信息条件、偏差可分辨性,以及来源数和参数维度增长时的限制与选择程序。
阅读边界
仅依据所给Crossref摘要;未给出稳健性成立的条件或允许偏差的范围,不能将“许多来源有偏”理解为可任意污染。

原文摘要

Summary Information from multiple data sources is increasingly available. However, some data sources may produce biased estimates due to biased sampling, data corruption or model misspecification. Thus there is a need for robust data combination methods that can be used with biased sources. In this paper, a robust data fusion-extraction method is proposed. Unlike existing methods, the proposed method can be applied in the important case where researchers have no knowledge of which data sources are unbiased. The proposed estimator is easy to compute and employs only summary statistics; hence it can be applied in many different fields, such as meta-analysis, Mendelian randomization and distributed systems. The proposed estimator is consistent, even if many data sources are biased, and is asymptotically equivalent to the oracle estimator that uses only unbiased data. Asymptotic normality of the proposed estimator is also established. In contrast to existing meta-analysis methods, the theoretical properties are guaranteed for our estimator, even if the number of data sources and the dimension of the parameter diverge as the sample size increases. Furthermore, the proposed method provides consistent selection for unbiased data sources with probability approaching 1. Simulation studies demonstrate the efficiency and robustness of the proposed method empirically. The method is applied to a meta-analysis dataset to evaluate surgical treatment for moderate periodontal disease and to a Mendelian randomization dataset to study the risk factors for head and neck cancer.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文