跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接讨论观察性研究的混杂控制、因果图与协变量调整集选择。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
F. Richard Guo
Qingyuan Zhao

通过迭代扩展因果图选择混杂变量

研究问题
在难以预先指定完整因果图与观测变量集合时,如何逐步选择足以控制处理与结果混杂的协变量集合?
方法与思路
作者提出交互式程序,逐步向使用者获取成对变量的主要调整集,据此扩展因果图,直到找到调整集或判定不存在。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该程序无需事先完整指定因果图,也无需混杂变量间的因果关系;每一步输入正确时,程序具有可靠性与完备性。
阅读关注点
应核对主要调整集的定义、每一步所需知识、图扩展及停止规则,并查看可靠性和完备性证明涵盖何种因果图。
阅读边界
以下沿用原解读对于其预印本摘要的限制:这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审与接收未获确认;摘要未说明错误输入的处理,理论保证依赖使用者每一步正确提供调整集。 复用旧预印本摘要解读;摘要与本条目相同,未另读刊稿全文,原请求未记录具体预印本版本。

原文摘要

Confounder selection, namely choosing a set of covariates to control for confounding between a treatment and an outcome, is arguably the most important step in the design of an observational study. Previous methods, such as Pearl's back-door criterion, typically require pre-specifying a causal graph, which can often be difficult in practice. We propose an interactive procedure for confounder selection that does not require pre-specifying the graph or the set of observed variables. This procedure iteratively expands the causal graph by finding what we call "primary adjustment sets" for a pair of possibly confounded variables. This can be viewed as inverting a sequence of marginalizations of the underlying causal graph. Structural information in the form of primary adjustment sets is elicited from the user, bit by bit, until either a set of covariates is found to control for confounding or it can be determined that no such set exists. Other information, such as the causal relations between confounders, is not required by the procedure. We show that if the user correctly specifies the primary adjustment sets in every step, our procedure is both sound and complete.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文