Finite-Sample Risk Approximation and Risk-Consistent Tuning for Generalized Ridge Estimation in Nonlinear Models: Controlling Extreme Realizations
非线性模型中广义岭估计的有限样本风险近似与风险一致调参AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：核心贡献是一般非线性模型的正则化风险理论，倾向得分仅作为应用出现，不足以限定其所属细分。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
非线性模型中广义岭估计的有限样本风险近似与风险一致调参
- 研究问题
- 非线性模型信息不足时，极端估计实现可能主导均方误差，如何通过正则化和数据驱动调参控制风险，并接近理想风险表现？
- 方法与思路
- 作者基于高阶展开构造广义岭估计有限样本均方误差的一阶近似，显式描述偏差与方差权衡，再据此选择惩罚参数并分析风险。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，一阶近似显示即使收缩目标误设也可改善均方误差，所提调参规则具有 oracle 风险一致性，模拟展示极端实现减少。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对风险近似的展开尺度、余项控制及适用模型，检查目标误设和弱信息情形的条件，并理解风险一致性与实际调参之间的关系。
- 阅读边界
- 这是 arXiv 预印本，不能据此确认同行评审或期刊接收。摘要未说明近似精度与完整条件，一阶风险改善不能直接视为普遍有限样本优势。
原文摘要
Maximum likelihood estimation in nonlinear models can exhibit substantial instability in finite samples when the data provide limited information about certain parameters. Such instability is driven by rare but extreme realizations of the estimator, which can dominate mean squared error (MSE) and lead to poor performance of conventional estimators. To address this issue, we consider ridge estimators that directly target MSE through regularization and thereby control extreme realizations. Developing this approach raises several challenges, including characterizing finite-sample MSE, selecting the penalty parameter, and achieving oracle risk performance. We address these challenges using a unified framework based on a finite-sample approximation to the MSE. Building on higher-order expansions, we derive an explicit first-order approximation to the finite-sample MSE of generalized ridge estimators in a broad class of nonlinear models. This approximation reveals an explicit bias--variance trade-off and shows that generalized ridge estimators can improve upon the MLE in terms of MSE at the first-order level, even under target misspecification. It also provides a tractable foundation for analyzing data-driven tuning, enabling us to show that the proposed MSE-based selection rule achieves oracle risk consistency. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method substantially reduces the frequency and impact of extreme realizations, leading to large improvements in finite-sample risk relative to both the maximum likelihood estimator and cross-validation-based methods. An empirical illustration shows that the proposed MSE-based tuning approach can stabilize first-stage propensity score estimation and reveal sensitivity in subsequent treatment effect estimates that remains hidden under conventional estimators.