跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕随机对照试验的干预效果分析及其推断有效性展开,直接关联因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Kaitlyn R. Webb
Soumya Mukherjee
Aratrika Mustafi
Lars Vilhuber

评估差分隐私对随机对照试验分析的实用性

研究问题
在共享随机对照试验数据时,隐私保护的合成数据生成方法能否保留原有政策评估分析及统计推断的有效性?
方法与思路
作者利用经济与政策研究的复现包,实施三种基于扰动直方图的隐私算法,并通过模拟和已发表研究的复现评估效果。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,作者识别了直接使用直方图方法的困难并提出调整,在多种参数设置下展示了隐私保护数据支持有效推断的可能性。
阅读关注点
应核对隐私预算、邻接关系和算法调整是否满足正式隐私保证,以及推断有效性的评价指标、重复实验设计与适用条件。
阅读边界
所据为 arXiv 预印本,不能据此认定已同行评审或获期刊接收;摘要未给出隐私参数与结果细节,不能推及所有试验。

原文摘要

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have become powerful tools for assessing the impact of interventions and policies in many contexts. They are considered the gold standard for causal inference in the biomedical fields and many social sciences. Researchers have published an increasing number of studies that rely on RCTs for at least part of their inference. These studies typically include the response data that has been collected, de-identified, and sometimes protected through traditional disclosure limitation methods. In this paper, we empirically assess the impact of privacy-preserving synthetic data generation methodologies on published RCT analyses by leveraging available replication packages (research compendia) in economics and policy analysis. We implement three privacy-preserving algorithms, that use as a base one of the basic differentially private (DP) algorithms, the perturbed histogram, to support the quality of statistical inference. We highlight challenges with the straight use of this algorithm and the stability-based histogram in our setting and described the adjustments needed. We provide simulation studies and demonstrate that we can replicate the analysis in a published economics article on privacy-protected data under various parameterizations. We find that relatively straightforward (at a high-level) privacy-preserving methods influenced by DP techniques allow for inference-valid protection of published data. The results have applicability to researchers wishing to share RCT data, especially in the context of low- and middle-income countries, with strong privacy protection.

笔记与分组