Testing Mutually Exclusive Hypotheses for Multi-Response Regressions
多响应回归中互斥假设的检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用多响应参数回归的模型检验,没有明确的因果、面板、时间序列或金融研究对象。
多响应回归中互斥假设的检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper proposes an adaptive-to-model test to check the null hypothesis with no more than one coordinate of the response vector relating to the predictor vector in parametric multi-response regressions. To this end, we decompose the null hypothesis into several mutually exclusive sub-null hypotheses and suggest a model identification to construct an adaptive-to-sub-null hypothesis test tackling their mutual exclusiveness, and an adaptive-to-regression test handling the regression function mis-specification. The final test combines a further model identification to be an adaptive-to-model hybrid of these two tests. It has the chi-square weak limit under the null hypothesis even when the dimensions of the response and the predictor vectors increase with the sample size and is omnibus. We conduct a systematic analysis of the significance level maintenance and power performance of the test to reveal its different sensitivity rates of convergence to different sub-local alternatives distinct from the null hypothesis. This is a significant distinction against any existing model checking problems for regressions. Further, the proposed model identifications can also assist in identifying the responses with non-constant regressions and testing their mis-specification. Numerical studies include simulations to examine the finite sample performances and to illustrate real data analyses for two data sets.