跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要同时讨论最优治疗方案的因果条件与个体重复纵向测量,分别对应因果推断和面板数据相关方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Eric B. Laber
Ana-Maria Staicu

个体化治疗方案的函数型特征构造

研究问题
如何将稀疏、不规则且带噪声的治疗前纵向测量用于个体化治疗选择,避免任意标量汇总带来的信息与识别损失?
方法与思路
作者把纵向信息视为带测量误差的潜在随机过程,将其泛函与结局模型结合,构造可解释且有助于治疗决策的特征。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该方法对最优治疗方案具有一致性,且所需因果假设弱于采用任意标量汇总的 Q-learning 方法。
阅读关注点
应核对较弱因果假设的准确表述、潜在过程与特征的估计方式,以及特征构造如何利用治疗、结局和其他协变量。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的索引摘要;摘要未给出因果条件和一致性定理的细节,不能解释为对所有纵向测量设计均有效。

原文摘要

Evidence-based personalized medicine formalizes treatment selection as an individualized treatment regime that maps up-to-date patient information into the space of possible treatments. Available patient information may include static features such race, gender, family history, genetic and genomic information, as well as longitudinal information including the emergence of comorbidities, waxing and waning of symptoms, side-effect burden, and adherence. Dynamic information measured at multiple time points before treatment assignment should be included as input to the treatment regime. However, subject longitudinal measurements are typically sparse, irregularly spaced, noisy, and vary in number across subjects. Existing estimators for treatment regimes require equal information be measured on each subject and thus standard practice is to summarize longitudinal subject information into a scalar, ad hoc summary during data preprocessing. This reduction of the longitudinal information to a scalar feature precedes estimation of a treatment regime and is therefore not informed by subject outcomes, treatments, or covariates. Furthermore, we show that this reduction requires more stringent causal assumptions for consistent estimation than are necessary. We propose a data-driven method for constructing maximally prescriptive yet interpretable features that can be used with standard methods for estimating optimal treatment regimes. In our proposed framework, we treat the subject longitudinal information as a realization of a stochastic process observed with error at discrete time points. Functionals of this latent process are then combined with outcome models to estimate an optimal treatment regime. The proposed methodology requires weaker causal assumptions than Q-learning with an ad hoc scalar summary and is consistent for the optimal treatment regime. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组