跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究随机实验的异质性处理效应,估计分组效应和受影响群体特征,并结合机器学习开展因果推断。

反馈分类问题

Fisher–Schultz Lecture: Generic Machine Learning Inference on Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments, With an Application to Immunization in India

随机实验中异质性处理效应的通用机器学习推断及印度免疫接种应用

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Mert Demirer
Esther Duflo

随机实验中异质性处理效应的通用机器学习推断及印度免疫接种应用

研究问题
在高维随机实验中,机器学习只能提供未必一致的效应代理时,如何估计并推断异质性效应的关键特征及受影响群体特征?
方法与思路
作者将效应代理后处理为最佳线性预测、分组平均效应及群体特征,利用重复样本拆分和分位数聚合开展估计与推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,框架可配合多类机器学习方法,聚合相较单次拆分降低估计风险,并提出改善初步效应代理的因果学习目标。
阅读关注点
应核对代理无需一致估计时仍可识别哪些特征、拆分与聚合的推断条件,以及因果学习目标和免疫接种应用的实现。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法核实聚合有效性的具体条件或应用数值;关键特征可推断不等于个体处理效应可一致估计。

原文摘要

We propose strategies to estimate and make inference on key features of heterogeneous effects in randomized experiments. These key features include best linear predictors of the effects using machine learning proxies, average effects sorted by impact groups , and average characteristics of most and least impacted units . The approach is valid in high‐dimensional settings, where the effects are proxied (but not necessarily consistently estimated) by predictive and causal machine learning methods. We post‐process these proxies into estimates of the key features. Our approach is generic; it can be used in conjunction with penalized methods, neural networks, random forests, boosted trees, and ensemble methods, both predictive and causal. Estimation and inference are based on repeated data splitting to avoid overfitting and achieve validity. We use quantile aggregation of the results across many potential splits, in particular taking medians of p ‐values and medians and other quantiles of confidence intervals. We show that quantile aggregation lowers estimation risks over a single split procedure, and establish its principal inferential properties. Finally, our analysis reveals ways to build provably better machine learning proxies through causal learning: we can use the objective functions that we develop to construct the best linear predictors of the effects, to obtain better machine learning proxies in the initial step. We illustrate the use of both inferential tools and causal learners with a randomized field experiment that evaluates a combination of nudges to stimulate demand for immunization in India.

笔记与分组