跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文本围绕自回归过程的单位根、特征根和检验渐近分布展开;“不稳定”指根的性质,未提供结构突变证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Bent Nielsen

不稳定自回归过程单位根检验的渐近分布

研究问题
单位根检验的渐近理论是否必须要求其余特征根平稳?当自回归过程含爆炸根或其他非平稳根时,似然类与非似然类检验有何差别?
方法与思路
所给文本在高斯自回归模型中比较似然比及其他检验的渐近分布,讨论鞅差创新的稳健性,并由无确定性趋势扩展到含确定性项的模型。
材料陈述的贡献
作者称,对似然比及若干似然类统计量,其余根平稳的条件可省略,但恰有一个可差分消除的单位根仍必要;某些非似然检验仍需平稳根条件。
阅读关注点
应核对可省略根条件的统计量范围、恰有一个单位根的精确定义,以及干扰参数、确定性项和创新条件如何影响检验分布与临界值。
阅读边界
所给文本带有正文结构和文献标记,并非规范摘要;含爆炸根时部分推断仍可能有效,但不能据此泛化到所有检验或整个参数空间。

原文摘要

UNIT ROOT TESTING has been developed through numerous papers since the work of Ž. Dickey and Fuller 1979 . The idea is to test the hypothesis that the differences of an observed time series do not depend on its levels, or in other words, the levels of the time series have a unit root that can be removed by differencing. While it is in general possible to have multiple unit roots, only the hypothesis of exactly one unit root is considered Ž. here. The available tests therefore hinge on two assumptions: i the levels of the time Ž. series have exactly one unit root which can be removed by differencing, and ii the remaining characteristic roots of the time series are stationary roots. In this paper it is proved that for the likelihood ratio test and a number of other likelihood based statistics Ž. Ž . the assumption ii is redundant whereas i is necessary. It is also shown that for some tests that are not likelihood based it is indeed necessary to assume that the differences have stationary roots. The consequences of the result are perhaps best understood from the implications of Ž. condition i . For autoregressive models of order two or higher, that condition is not satisfied in the entire parameter space and the asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio test for a unit root depends on unknown nuisance parameters. In this situation the test statistic is not pivotal; hence the test is not similar, and this complicates the testing. Ž. For non-likelihood based tests the necessity of condition ii implies an additional similarity problem. The practitioner is therefore faced with a trade off between likelihood based tests with fewer similarity problems and other tests that may have other advantageous properties. There are thus two empirical implications of the result. First, when analyzing time series with stationary roots that have modulus close to one so that Ž. condition ii is nearly violated, then the likelihood based tests are preferable and other tests should be used cautiously. Secondly, if explosive roots are found in an application, most of the statistical analysis is actually valid and should not necessarily be disregarded because of the presence of explosive roots. Section 2 presents a Gaussian autoregressive model along with its statistical analysis Ž. and the result showing that condition ii is redundant for likelihood based tests. Robustness with respect to innovations that are martingale difference is also discussed. The results of Section 2 are given for a model without deterministic trends. In Section 3 these are generalized to models with deterministic terms. The mathematical proofs Ž. following in two Appendices are based on the work of Lai and Wei 1983 and Chan and Ž. Wei 1988 .

笔记与分组
相关领域论文