跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于通用稀疏信号选择后推断,未明确涉及所列经济计量细分领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
S Woody
O H M Padilla
J G Scott

稀疏信号的最优选择后推断:非参数经验贝叶斯方法

研究问题
稀疏信号筛选之后,如何对信号大小构造兼顾收缩、选择偏差校正与频率学覆盖保证的短置信集合?
方法与思路
作者用非参数经验贝叶斯方法构造选择调整置信集合,在覆盖约束下优化平均长度,并研究其向已知先验分析的收敛。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,置信集合保持参数空间上一致的精确频率学覆盖,平均长度最优;若干例子中比现有方法更短。
阅读关注点
应核对选择机制、覆盖概率的定义、平均长度最优的比较类别,以及经验先验估计与趋近已知先验分析的条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法核验精确覆盖和最优性的具体范围;例子中的长度优势不能视为普遍数值优势。

原文摘要

Summary Many recently developed Bayesian methods focus on sparse signal detection. However, much less work has been done on the natural follow-up question: how does one make valid inferences for the magnitude of those signals after selection? Ordinary Bayesian credible intervals suffer from selection bias, as do ordinary frequentist confidence intervals. Existing Bayesian methods for correcting this bias produce credible intervals with poor frequentist properties. Further, existing frequentist approaches require sacrificing the benefits of shrinkage typical in Bayesian methods, resulting in confidence intervals that are needlessly wide. We address this gap by proposing a nonparametric empirical Bayes approach to constructing optimal selection-adjusted confidence sets. Our method produces confidence sets that are as short as possible on average, while both adjusting for selection and maintaining exact frequentist coverage uniformly over the parameter space. We demonstrate an important consistency property of our procedure: under mild conditions, it asymptotically converges to the results of an oracle-Bayes analysis in which the prior distribution of signal sizes is known exactly. Across a series of examples, the method is found to outperform existing frequentist techniques for post-selection inference, producing confidence sets that are notably shorter, but with the same coverage guarantee.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文