Determining the dimension of iterative Hessian transformation
迭代 Hessian 变换的维数确定AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦一般条件均值降维,未明确涉及所列因子模型或其他经济计量细分领域。
反馈分类问题迭代 Hessian 变换的维数确定AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The central mean subspace (CMS) and iterative Hessian transformation (IHT) have been introduced recently for dimension reduction when the conditional mean is of interest. Suppose that X is a vector-valued predictor and Y is a scalar response. The basic problem is to find a lower-dimensional predictor ηTX such that E(Y|X)=E(Y|ηTX). The CMS defines the inferential object for this problem and IHT provides an estimating procedure. Compared with other methods, IHT requires fewer assumptions and has been shown to perform well when the additional assumptions required by those methods fail. In this paper we give an asymptotic analysis of IHT and provide stepwise asymptotic hypothesis tests to determine the dimension of the CMS, as estimated by IHT. Here, the original IHT method has been modified to be invariant under location and scale transformations. To provide empirical support for our asymptotic results, we will present a series of simulation studies. These agree well with the theory. The method is applied to analyze an ozone data set.