Fiducial inference for location and scale parameters
位置与尺度参数的信仰推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般位置尺度模型与信仰推断,未提供对应所列经济计量细分领域的直接依据。
位置与尺度参数的信仰推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Some recent papers on fiducial inference for location and scale parameters are examined from the transformation-parameter viewpoint developed in Fraser (1961a, b). For the multivariate normal case with a covariance matrix of known form, an apparent conflict between two fiducial distributions is found to be due to the inappropriate use of one of the distributions. For the multivariate normal case with an unknown covariance matrix, the Fisher-Cornish fiducial distribution for the means is apparently invalid as its derivation violates accepted rules for obtaining fiducial distributions. A fiducial distribution can, however, be developed from the transformation-parameter model and it utilizes additional structure in the form of regressions among the co-ordinates of the basic variable. The alternative fiducial distribution in Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference (Fisher, 1956) is in conflict with this transformation-parameter fiducial distribution.