跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用元分析和置信分布理论,医疗应用本身不足以支持所列因果推断等领域分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Minge Xie
Kesar Singh

置信分布与元分析的统一框架

研究问题
如何汇总独立来源研究所提供的参数信息,使传统显著性合并和模型型元分析纳入统一框架,并提高对污染数据的稳健性?
方法与思路
作者以置信分布函数承载参数推断信息,构造研究合并框架,并分别在单项研究样本量增加和研究数量增加时发展稳健方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称框架涵盖多种已有合并方法,并产生两种新稳健元分析方法;理论支持较高崩溃点及正态模型下的高效率。
阅读关注点
应核对置信分布的校准与合并规则、研究独立性要求、两种渐近框架,以及污染定义和稳健效率比较的条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;研究异质性处理及具体理论条件未说明,不能将合并结果直接视为因果证据。

原文摘要

This article develops a unifying framework, as well as robust meta-analysis approaches, for combining studies from independent sources. The device used in this combination is a confidence distribution (CD), which uses a distribution function, instead of a point (point estimator) or an interval (confidence interval), to estimate a parameter of interest. A CD function contains a wealth of information for inferences, and it is a useful device for combining studies from different sources. The proposed combining framework not only unifies most existing meta-analysis approaches, but also leads to development of new approaches. We illustrate in this article that this combining framework can include both the classical methods of combining p-values and modern model-based meta-analysis approaches. We also develop, under the unifying framework, two new robust meta-analysis approaches, with supporting asymptotic theory. In one approach each study size goes to infinity, and in the other approach the number of studies goes to infinity. Our theoretical development suggests that both these robust meta-analysis approaches have high breakdown points and are highly efficient for normal models. The new methodologies are applied to study-level data from publications on prophylactic use of lidocaine in heart attacks and a treatment of stomach ulcers. The robust methods performed well when data are contaminated and have realistic sample sizes and number of studies.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文