Misspecification of noncausal order in autoregressive processes
自回归过程中的非因果阶数误设AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕非因果及混合自回归过程的阶数误设、极大似然估计和模型选择展开,明确属于时间序列分析方向。
自回归过程中的非因果阶数误设AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper examines noncausal order misspecification in noncausal and mixed processes. We consider the constrained maximum likelihood (ML) estimators of autoregressive parameters obtained when noncausal order s is fixed and potentially different from the true order s0. The effect of such noncausal order misspecification on the constrained ML estimators of the autoregressive parameters is examined by means of the binding function. We find that, surprisingly, the misspecified estimators are consistent over significant regions of the parameter space. Next, we examine the properties of the unconstrained ML estimator sˆ which is obtained when the objective function is maximized with respect to all model parameters, including the noncausal order s. In this context, we prove the consistency of sˆ and derive its speed of convergence and asymptotic distribution. However, as the noncausal order is integer-valued, the problem of identifying s concerns rather model selection than standard estimation. We also find that mixed models of different noncausal orders and with the same total autoregressive order are non-nested. This allows us to propose a new approach for robust identification of the noncausal order from a battery of direct and indirect encompassing tests. These tests are based on the difference between the constrained maximum likelihood and indirect inference estimators of the parameters characterizing the mixed causal/noncausal dynamics.