跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于混合数据条件密度估计的一般方法,未直接研究分位数、分布效应或宏观预测。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Peter Hall
Jeff Racine
Qi Li

交叉验证与条件概率密度估计

研究问题
在解释变量同时包含连续与离散信息时,如何为非参数条件密度估计选择平滑参数,并排除无关变量?
方法与思路
作者通过交叉验证选择各变量的平滑参数,对无关变量赋予较大的平滑程度,从而压低其对估计方差的贡献。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称交叉验证能以过度平滑消除无关变量,同时为相关变量提供渐近最优平滑,并揭示变量相关性的信息。
阅读关注点
应核对无关变量的正式定义、所需独立性条件、混合数据核函数、交叉验证准则,以及渐近最优性的评价标准。
阅读边界
所给 OpenAlex 索引摘要未注明稿件版本;摘要未列出完整独立性与正则条件,其关于方法优势的表述不能视为全面比较结论。

原文摘要

Many practical problems, especially some connected with forecasting, require nonparametric estimation of conditional densities from mixed data. For example, given an explanatory data vector X for a prospective customer, with components that could include the customer's salary, occupation, age, sex, marital status, and address, a company might wish to estimate the density of the expenditure, Y, that could be made by that person, basing the inference on observations of (X, Y) for previous clients. Choosing appropriate smoothing parameters for this problem can be tricky, not in the least because plug-in rules take a particularly complex form in the case of mixed data. An obvious difficulty is that there exists no general formula for the optimal smoothing parameters. More insidiously, and more seriously, it can be difficult to determine which components of X are relevant to the problem of conditional inference. For example, if the jth component of X is independent of Y, then that component is irrelevant to estimating the density of Y given X, and ideally should be dropped before conducting inference. In this article we show that cross-validation overcomes these difficulties. It automatically determines which components are relevant and which are not, through assigning large smoothing parameters to the latter and consequently shrinking them toward the uniform distribution on the respective marginals. This effectively removes irrelevant components from contention, by suppressing their contribution to estimator variance; they already have very small bias, a consequence of their independence of Y. Cross-validation also yields important information about which components are relevant; the relevant components are precisely those that cross-validation has chosen to smooth in a traditional way, by assigning them smoothing parameters of conventional size. Indeed, cross-validation produces asymptotically optimal smoothing for relevant components, while eliminating irrelevant components by oversmoothing. In the problem of nonparametric estimation of a conditional density, cross-validation comes into its own as a method with no obvious peers.

笔记与分组