跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究随机化实验、缺失结局下的设计型因果检验及置信区域。

反馈分类问题

Design-Based Causal Inference with Missing Outcomes: Missingness Mechanisms, Imputation-Assisted Randomization Tests, and Covariate Adjustment

结局缺失下的设计型因果推断:缺失机制、插补辅助随机化检验与协变量调整

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Siyu Heng
Jiawei Zhang
Yang Feng

结局缺失下的设计型因果推断:缺失机制、插补辅助随机化检验与协变量调整

研究问题
在有限总体随机化因果推断中,结局缺失如何影响无处理效应检验,怎样结合插补与协变量调整维持有效推断?
方法与思路
作者提出一般缺失机制和“插补与再插补”随机化检验框架,进一步加入协变量调整并构造缺失结局下的置信区域。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在所提机制下,即使插补模型错设或缺失机制含未观测协变量、干扰,框架仍可精确控制有限总体一类错误率。
阅读关注点
应核对缺失机制的限制、无效应原假设的形式、再插补如何随随机化实施,以及置信区域和协变量调整的有效性条件。
阅读边界
依据 arXiv 2310.18556v5 预印本摘要;不能据此声称已同行评审或期刊接收,也不能推断刊本变化。摘要未给出缺失机制的完整条件。

原文摘要

Design-based causal inference, also known as randomization-based or finite-population causal inference, is one of the most widely used causal inference frameworks, largely due to the merit that its validity can be guaranteed by study design (e.g., randomized experiments) and does not require assuming specific outcome-generating distributions or super-population models. Despite its advantages, design-based causal inference can still suffer from other issues, among which outcome missingness is a prevalent and significant challenge. This work systematically studies the outcome missingness problem in design-based causal inference. First, we propose a general and flexible outcome missingness mechanism that can facilitate finite-population-exact randomization tests of no treatment effect. Second, under this general missingness mechanism, we propose a general framework called ``imputation and re-imputation" for conducting randomization tests in design-based causal inference with missing outcomes. We prove that our framework can still ensure finite-population-exact type-I error rate control even when the imputation model was misspecified or when unobserved covariates or interference exist in the missingness mechanism. Third, we extend our framework to conduct covariate adjustment in randomization tests and construct finite-population-valid confidence regions with missing outcomes. Our framework is evaluated via extensive simulation studies and applied to a large-scale randomized experiment.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文