跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接建模国家间冲突网络、节点群组成员身份及双边连边形成。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Santiago Olivella
Tyler Pratt
Kosuke Imai

网络数据的动态随机区块回归模型:国际军事冲突应用

研究问题
国家特征、双边特征与随时间变化的地缘政治联盟成员身份,如何共同解释军事冲突网络的形成及民主和平现象?
方法与思路
作者结合隐马尔可夫模型与混合成员随机区块模型,让协变量同时预测节点的动态潜在群组成员身份和双边连边。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在历史军事争端数据中识别出两个民主国家集团,仅一个冲突率异常低,并发现民主变化与集团转移有关。
阅读关注点
应核对潜在集团的识别与解释、动态转移结构和协变量设定,以及联盟成员身份与冲突关系能否作因果解释。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;模型关系的因果识别、估计不确定性和稳健性细节未说明,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

The decision to engage in military conflict is shaped by many factors, including state- and dyad-level characteristics as well as the state’s membership in geopolitical coalitions. Supporters of the democratic peace theory, for example, hypothesize that the community of democratic states is less likely to wage war with each other. Such theories explain the ways in which nodal and dyadic characteristics affect the evolution of conflict patterns over time via their effects on group memberships. To test these arguments, we develop a dynamic model of network data by combining a hidden Markov model with a mixed-membership stochastic blockmodel that identifies latent groups underlying the network structure. Unlike existing models, we incorporate covariates that predict dynamic node memberships in latent groups as well as the direct formation of edges between dyads. While prior substantive research often assumes the decision to engage in international militarized conflict is independent across states and static over time, we demonstrate that conflict is driven by states’ evolving membership in geopolitical blocs. Our analysis of militarized disputes from 1816 to 2010 identifies two distinct blocs of democratic states, only one of which exhibits unusually low rates of conflict. Changes in monadic covariates like democracy shift states between coalitions, making some states more pacific but others more belligerent. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文